The evolutionary "scientific" community is increasingly being embarrassed by their enthusiasm to demonstrate "evolution is a fact". The more they work, the more the evidence piles up against them. This month I'm going to give an example of evolutions folly in their zeal to show dinosaurs "prove" evolution (this example is from the April 14th, 2000 issue of Science Magazine, page 238-239). In an article titled "Dinos and Turkeys: Connected by DNA" the claim is made that dinosaur DNA matched turkey DNA. They state that they may have recovered "a stretch of mitochrondrial DNA from 65-million-year old Triceratops bones in North Dakota." The problem with this finding is the survival of biological material for millions of years. Even they recognize the problem when later in the article they say: "DNA from dinos is 'for most people a truly heretical idea,'.because many experts believe nucleic acid is unlikely to survive more than 100,000 years." The claim made is that Triceratops dinosaur bones still only partially mineralized and containing DNA remained in the ground in North Dakota for 65 million years. Neither the bones nor this DNA decayed in 65 million years!!! Anyone who has studied biology knows that's impossible. Chemistry always wins over biology when an organism dies and it doesn't take millions of years to decay to nothing. Most dead creatures disappear in; days, weeks or months not years and certainly not millions of years. Sixty five million years of no rotting is a scientific impossibility. Their own evidence contradicts evolution. Will they now acknowledge dinosaur may only be extinct for only thousands of years, of course NOT, they are stuck with their model.